Dominance battles are rather amusing - but when you're in them they are deadly serious - one of my favourite section of 12 rules for life - is when Peterson has to confront his chronic alcoholic neighbour who keeps harassing him in the middle of the night selling electric appliances on his front doorstep - i know the feeling that Peterson felt when he had to rid his soul of the primitive primate dominance aspects ingrained in his body and DNA for millennia that wanted him to submit -
in the past it would have been a very dangerous strategy to confront someone a lot stronger and more aggressive than oneself - perhaps it was common practice to deal with them when they were asleep - if you think about it a common theme in films is sneaking up on the bad guy and banging them over the head - or running them through with a sword
- a similar more realistic drama likely unfolded for thousands of years for homo sapiens in our hominid past -
in fact, I watched a doco by David Attenborough and this exact thing occurred to the leader of a Chimp troop - he was set upon at night had many of his fingers ripped off and was left for dead -
he was the good leader! -
it certainly is tough at the top - it has been it always will be -

I had to engage in a dominance battle not long ago - my ability to do so was enabled by my ability to call on my Jungian shadow (instinct and disavowed aspects) - my shadow was angry and affronted - it unleashed verbally and with a strong dose of aggression - he met the aggressive nature of my interlocutor with gusto and cut through him like a knife through warm butter - my interlocutor was not a pleasant person - under his persona was a very disturbed and ugly person - and no, I'm not secretly talking about myself - he was trying to guide my life - he was trying to bend me to my will - but just like an overzealous child he found the boundary where my teeth erupted out of my jaw and curl and crush necks with canine precision - he has kept his distance ever since and been very docile - i knew something was up with him when he said his daughter had thrown a shoe at him - i too would throw a shoe at him if he was my Father - he had no boundaries - luckily I have my own -
i am encircled like a fortress and the drawbridge is only lowered for those who I can bear the smell of - it's like Nietzsche says in Beyond Good and Evil - you can smell nobility or the lack of - you can also read it in body language - do not make friends with men who are lesser than you -
it leads to regression - not progression - acknowledging one's baboon teeth is fun.
when I think of the top of human currently I think of Jeff Bezos - wow, this man is clever - to be able to build the biggest business out of a very small team is a gift - my only disappoint with Bezos is that he doesn't care more for his staff - he states that he is obsessed about the customer - his business model is customer centric - its build around satisfying the needs of customers - primarily around price - one would assume - the other form of business is product centric - obviously Amazon moves a lot of products so it is a combination of both - in effect, Amazon is a product centric business built around satisfying the needs of price and operational excellence - it would be great if Bezos looked after his staff more - limiting the level of dehumanizing exploitation - I've read articles on Amazon - they track employees hand movements with tech bracelets to make sure they are on task and maintaining an exceptionally high level of productivity - this is nothing new, however, it's more invasive - when I think of Amazon workers the American poet Charles Bukowski springs to mind -

Bukowski use to work in a post office sitting down and flinging letters into boxes sorting them for delivery, not unlike current Amazon workers and boxes - he said whenever he finished a shift a pool of sweat would encircle his chair - he did this for years, decades - only by the skin of his teeth did he manage to avoid performing such a job until he retired and pulled down a pension - he was rescued by a literary entrepreneur who saw great economic and literary potential in Bukowski - the man made a deal with Bukowski - he would give him a chunk of his income for life - if he would leave the post office and write full time -
Bukowski wrote his first novel in a matter of weeks - why? there's money in novels - one of the exceptional things I have taken away from Bukowski is when he talked to a young hippie man who was doing the new age spirituality thing -
Bukowski said, just get a job in the Post office, son - and you'll understand the universe - what did he mean by this?
If you get a job that is so demanding of you it will shatter your ego - your being or sense of self will be exploded and you will realize how you are not what you previously self-identified with -
Eckhart Tolle would agree with such a sentiment - he mutters how spiritual breakthroughs come about through the surmounting of suffering - Hemmingway and Nietzsche - thought the same thing. I do too.
I felt terrible recently - i had to meditate and navigate my negative thoughts - finally, i won the upper hand - the sense of clear-headedness and serenity was something completely out of the ordinary.
Hemmingway's writing is colourful - and if you are in the right mood and - read the right story - the result can be magical - I read the old man and the sea a few years back - the book had a teleporter quality to it - not unlike H.P Lovecraft -
you get the sense that you are delving into the deep recesses of the mind - the Jungian collective unconscious - the greatest stories are the ones with the storylines that run deepest into the psyche -
this is what surprised me about Oscar Wilde's short story about the mermaid (different to the old man and the sea, both revolve around oceans) - it read like a myth - the style was like reading a tale carved on top of a granite tomb - every word was so well placed - the small repetitions of sentence structures loudly echoed similar aspects in Homer's Iliad for instance -
What do H.P Lovecraft, Hemmingway, The Iliad and Wilde have in common - archetypal structures - the anima the idealized and evolutionary inheritance of all women passed down to men is apparent -
It's interesting how the anima is depicted as a mermaid in Wilde's story - and how there is essentially a battle over the man or self - between the shadow - the trauma and visceral and instinctual power of man
(we have both an individual and collective experience of the shadow. Just as there is a collective and personal unconscious within us from Jung's perspective - something I only found out recently but which makes a whole lot of sense. The personal unconscious is less archetypal and fundamental than the collective unconscious. Instead one can think about the two like this. The archetypes exist in the collective unconscious but they lack any form of symbolic expression; they are invisible phantoms. They then enter into the personal unconscious in which a person has stored all their personal experiences and the archetypes cloak themselves in experiential symbols and phenomena. It's helpful to know this. Especially if one is interested in interpreting dreams. Or living one's life.)
If you search through your dreams. You will realize the anima and the shadow are opposed and work together. One is the feminine the other is masculine. One is chaos, the other order. They are yin and yang.
Wilde's tale is interesting because the man is first captured by the anima - the mermaid and he swims down deep into the watery unconscious of the ocean with her. There they live happily. But the deal is that he has to meet his shadow on the land every couple of years. His actual shadow.
Previously, the man met a witch and he demands that she show him how to cut it off the shadow, which she does under threat of pain from the man.
But, when the shadow returns the man and it combines and go off on great adventures acquiring wealth and money, prestige and fame - nevertheless, the man returns to the water and parts from his shadow -
but in the end, I believe, if I recall correctly, the man - forsakes the mermaid and is bound to the shadow - as he did not understand after re-joining too many times he would never be able to separate from his shadow - the problem with this is serious - the man can not live with his anima mermaid in the unconscious if he has integrated his shadow - a precondition of living with the mermaid anima is that he splits himself from his shadow
A trade-off occurs within a man's life between one's allegiance to the shadow or the anima.
what I want you to take away from this tale is this -
the anima is crucial to coming to terms with oneself as a man - as displayed in Oscar Wilde's tale - the anima mermaid sets the man up for great success in the world - the man comes into contact with the deep and restorative powers of the anima the power of the feminine within him - only after this experience - after this rebirth has occurred - can he then return to the land of the living - reintegrate with his shadow and live a powerful and fulfilling life -
The same experience of literary characters is seen in Hemmingway - in his famous safari tale about shooting a lion and the buffalo - the man - rediscovers his true sense of self his shadow when he faces fear and risks death in failing to kill the lion - the experience of shame - the full extent of the failure of himself as a man weighs on him - but, he then shoots a whole lot of other animals - and regains a true sense of who he is - the man fails - then falls under the power of the shadow - which is unlocked by voluntarily confronting the terror of the lion -
but unlike in Wilde's story - the Anima figure in Hemmingway's tale is a troubled wife - who has cheated on him and dominates the man - she then becomes terrified when she sees the man has knitted his shadow back onto himself - consequently, she shots the man - because she knows he will either leave her or dominate her and be unstoppable - her window of opportunity to neutralize him is small - so she blasts him in the back of the head or neck - a man who has not undergone his development into manhood is one who has not knitted on his shadow - we see this in Peter pan - Wendy a kind anima figures sews it back on for him - and peter is then able to confront the world -
Why is the anima depicted as a mermaid in Wilde's story? and what can be grasped from this archetypally? The anima exits in the unconscious - this is her realm and domain - she is extremely powerful and can drag men into the unconscious - in fact, visiting the Anima in her lair is necessary - one has to map one's inner world to escape it - I think a deal is done between the anima and the shadow - the anima trains a man consoles him - and in doing so - she allows him to integrate every now and then with his shadow - after a time the process is no longer needed - the anima has performed her role - she then gives the man to the shadow - on the basis that the Anima is manifested in the world and married by the man and the shadow -

What would the basis of this assertion be? Think of the classic tale of the little mermaid - doesn't the mermaid always want her feet - doesn't she always want to walk on land and be instantiated in the world - obviously this is true - if this an easy task for her to achieve - no - does she exist in the unconscious with someone else - yes - her father - who I would claim is the shadow - after a bitter struggle a deal is done - the shadow grants the mermaid the ability to leave the unconscious world of the sea and walk on land - the man who was cast into the sea (the prince of the story) is rescued by the Anima - he is a man without his shadow - he re-orientates himself on the land (life) - but craves the solace of the Anima - the anima is granted access to the world when the man is ready and has established a place for himself in the world - the union between a man and anima that first operates in the unconscious world of the sea - plays out in the conscious world
One can also reverse this - as there is a melding of archetype narratives - the mermaid - is the women (human) - who needs to escape the unconscious - by dealing with her shadow (her Father in the tale) -
she does this and is then able to enter into the physical world and marry her prince (lover) in the land of clarity and consciousness.
One must enter into a union with the anima or animus within one's unconscious
Many of us divorce ourselves from this aspect of ourselves but it constantly appears
After some time one must confront the shadow - one's trauma and lost aspects of oneself
In integrating oneself with the unconscious and traumatic aspects of oneself
One becomes fully conscious
And can enter into the world on one's own terms consciously
One is then able to locate and secure a human being who takes on the symbolic form of the anima or animus in real life
One falls madly in love with and marries such a person
It is best to marry someone who has undergone the same process i.e escaped from the world of the unconscious through integration